/us/en/library.html

Fluorescence microscopy is an imaging technique that uses fluorescent dyes or proteins to label specific structures within a specimen. When illuminated with light of a particular wavelength, fluorophores emit light at a longer wavelength, which causes them to glow.

The principle of fluorescence, where a substance absorbs light and emits it, was first described in the 19th century. Fluorescence microscopy was developed in the early 20th century with ultraviolet light sources. In the 1960s, epifluorescence microscopes were invented, followed by confocal and super-resolution techniques.¹

Today, fluorescence microscopy is vital in life sciences for observing cells, tissues, or molecules with high specificity and contrast. Unlike brightfield microscopy, which uses transmitted light and stains, fluorescence microscopy highlights labeled components, offering high contrast and detailed molecular information.²

Basic Principles of Fluorescence

Fluorescence occurs when a molecule absorbs light at a specific excitation wavelength and emits light at a longer emission wavelength, due to energy loss. The difference is called the Stokes shift, distinguishing emitted light from the excitation source. This is used in microscopy by tagging molecules with fluorophores to produce high-contrast images of cellular structures and processes.³

Every fluorophore has distinct excitation and emission spectra. Optical filters, such as excitation filters, dichroic mirrors and emission filters, match the characteristic spectra of the selected fluorophore. ²

Fluorescent imaging, while providing contrast and specificity, can be challenging due to problems, including: ⁴

Nonetheless, these challenges can be mitigated using antifade agents, minimizing light exposure and selecting photostable fluorophores.⁴

Components of a Fluorescence Microscope

Light Sources and Filter Sets

Fluorescence microscopy needs stable, intense light sources at specific wavelengths. For advanced methods, common options include mercury and xenon lamps, LEDs, and lasers. Filter sets ensure only desired wavelengths are detected with excitation filters, dichroic mirrors, and emission filters.⁵

Objectives, Detectors and Cameras

The objective lens delivers excitation light by focusing it onto the sample. It also collects signals from the fluorophores and directs them toward the eyepiece and detector to visualize and quantify intensity.⁵

Imaging Systems and Image Acquisition

Modern fluorescence microscopes integrate computer-controlled imaging systems for signal processing, time-lapse recording and three-dimensional image reconstruction, improving visualization and data analysis functionalities.⁵

Inverted Fluorescence Microscope

Typically used in live-cell imaging, the inverted fluorescence microscopes have the objective lenses above the specimen with the light source shining below.⁶

Introduction to Fluorescence Microscopy

Fluorescence Microscopy
DMi1 Inverted Microscope for Cell Culture

DMi1 Inverted Microscope for Cell Culture

The DMi1 inverted microscope supports your specific work routine in your cell culture lab. Its operation is so intuitive, its handling so comfortable that you can fully concentrate on your work. Choose the functions you need, and, if necessary, you can easily add a variety of accessories that are important for your work.

Learn More

Types and Techniques of Fluorescence Microscopy

Epifluorescence Microscopy

Epifluorescence directs excitation light through the objective lens onto the sample and collects emitted light along the same path. Many of the fluorescence microscopes used in life sciences adhere to the design of epifluorescence microscopy.⁷

Widefield Fluorescence Microscopy

Widefield microscopy uses a parallel beam to illuminate the entire specimen at once. It is simple and cost-effective for viewing the fluorescence distribution throughout the sample, but it does not provide detailed information about 3D structures.⁷

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal microscopes use additional optics and a spatial pinhole to eliminate out-of-focus light, which helps produce sharper, high-resolution images. They produce 3D images of cells by first capturing a series of thin slices through the specimen and using optical sectioning to reconstruct the image.⁷

Multiphoton and Two-photon Microscopy

Multiphoton techniques use near-infrared lasers to excite fluorophores only at the focal point. Thus, they protect live cells from phototoxicity while penetrating deep into the sample, making them ideal for live-cell imaging. ²

Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy

TIRF excites fluorophores close to the glass/water (or glass/specimen) interface, making it ideal for studying cell membranes, adhesion and molecular interactions near coverslips.⁸

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Techniques such as simulated emission depletion (STED), photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM), and Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM) overcome the diffraction limit, enabling imaging at nanometer resolution to visualize molecular structures.⁷,⁹

Advanced Techniques

Fluorescent Probes and Labeling

Fluorescence microscopy relies on a variety of probes to label target molecules. These tools include fluorescent dyes (e.g., FITC, rhodamine, DAPI) and molecular probes (e.g., calcium indicators, nucleic acid stains).¹⁴,¹⁵ Inherently fluorescent proteins, such as green fluorescent protein and its variants, enable live-cell imaging by tagging specific proteins of interest without additional labeling.¹⁶

When selecting the ideal fluorophore, researchers must consider its excitation/emission spectra, brightness, photostability and compatibility with other labels in multicolor experiments. Furthermore, they should select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap for clear signal separation.¹⁵

Immunofluorescence staining is one of the most common uses of fluorophores. This method helps target specific proteins in fixed specimens by conjugating antibodies to fluorescent dyes.¹⁷ On the other hand, genetically encoded fluorescent proteins are suitable for labelling live cells to view dynamic processes.¹⁶

Applications of Fluorescence Microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy is a cornerstone in many life sciences fields.

Live-Cell Imaging and Advanced Usage

Live-cell fluorescence microscopy enables studying dynamic biological processes in real time, such as metabolism, signal transduction and cell division.²⁵ However, maintaining cell viability is crucial, especially when exposed to laser beams. Key issues in live-cell imaging include photobleaching, phototoxicity and background fluorescence.²⁶

Researchers should employ low-intensity illumination whenever possible and monitor environmental controls (temperature, humidity, CO₂). Furthermore, they should select non-toxic fluorophores or genetically encoded fluorescent proteins.²⁶

Image acquisition and analysis software can interpret live-cell imaging more comprehensively. Modern fluorescence microscopes feature time-lapse imaging, spectral separation and image reconstruction for high-quality documentation. Furthermore, they can measure fluorescence intensity, colocalization and binding kinetics of labeled molecules with the help of image processing software.²⁷

Advantages, Limitations and Safety Considerations

Fluorescence microscopy offers high sensitivity and specificity for visualizing subcellular structures and macromolecules that cannot be viewed under traditional light microscopy. Its combination with real-time imaging and multicolor labelling technologies is invaluable for cell biology, diagnostics and drug discovery.³

Despite its power, fluorescence microscopy has constraints that affect research quality and pose health risks. Light diffraction, necessitating super-resolution techniques, limits conventional fluorescence microscopy's resolution.²⁸ Visualizing thick specimens is challenging due to poor penetration, which causes blurred signals. Overlap of fluorophore spectra and autofluorescence interference from biological materials can also complicate signal detection interpretation.²

Image quality may decline due to fading (signal reduction over time), quenching (signal suppression by environmental factors) and photobleaching (permanent fluorophore damage from light exposure). Issues regarding image quality can be mitigated by minimizing illumination, using antifade reagents and choosing photostable dyes.²⁶

Finally, researchers must follow safety measures, including: ²

Comparison with Other Imaging Techniques

Before deciding whether fluorescence microscopy is the most suitable technology for a research application, it is essential to understand its differences from other microscopy technologies.

Brightfield microscopy uses transmitted white light and stains to visualize structures, but lacks specificity and contrast for molecular targets. In contrast, fluorescence microscopy uses probes to highlight specific molecules, allowing the tracking of proteins, nucleic acids and organelles.²⁹

Unlike conventional fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy can provide structural detail at nanometer resolution. However, it requires fixed samples, making it unsuitable for live-cell studies.³⁰

On the other hand, phase contrast microscopy is ideal for live cells, generating contrast in transparent specimens without dyes. However, it does not provide the molecular specificity that can be obtained from fluorescence imaging.³¹

Fluor microscopy is preferred when researchers need to target and monitor subcellular structures, macromolecules and their dynamics with high resolution. Furthermore, nanoscale resolution can be achieved in fluorescence microscopy through advanced optical methods.

Many innovations are underway to enhance fluorescence microscopy's image quality, speed and analytical accuracy.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies can be combined with automation to utilize fluorescence microscopy in high-throughput drug or target screening. These technologies drive faster image acquisition, advanced noise reduction and automated pattern recognition for large datasets.³² In addition, automation-driven workflows aid simultaneous detection of multiple targets across thousands of cells or tissues, accelerating drug discovery and systems biology research.²²

Simultaneously, limitations regarding brightness, stability and photobleaching are being addressed by developing far-red or near-infrared dyes and engineered fluorescent proteins.³³,³⁴

Super-resolution and single-molecule tracking techniques allow observing individual protein interactions and nanoscale dynamics.¹³ These advancements make fluorescence microscopy compatible with other microscopy methods and multi-omics studies, driving seamless analysis of heterogeneous cell populations on a single-cell level.³⁵

See how Danaher Life Sciences can help

Talk to an expert

FAQs

What is the principle of fluorescence detection, and how does fluorescence microscopy work?

Fluorescence microscopy uses fluorophores that absorb light at one wavelength (excitation) and emit light at a longer wavelength (emission). Optical filters separate these signals, allowing researchers to visualize labeled molecules with high specificity.

What is the difference between widefield and confocal fluorescence microscopy?

Standard fluorescence microscopy captures all emitted light, while confocal microscopy uses a pinhole to exclude out-of-focus light. This improves resolution and creates sharper 3D images.

What are the main applications of fluorescence microscopy in research and diagnostics?

It is widely used for studying protein localization, gene expression, live-cell imaging, pathogen detection and clinical diagnostics.

What is the purpose of emission and excitation filters in fluorescence microscopy?

Excitation filters select the proper wavelength to excite fluorophores, while emission filters isolate only the emitted fluorescent signal.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of fluorescence microscopy?

Advantages include high sensitivity, molecular specificity and live-cell imaging. Limitations include photobleaching, phototoxicity and limited depth penetration.

References

  1. Renz M. Fluorescence microscopy—A historical and technical perspective. Cytometry Part A 2013;83(9):767-779.
  2. Hickey SM, Ung B, Bader C, Brooks R, Lazniewska J, Johnson IR, et al. Fluorescence microscopy—an outline of hardware, biological handling, and fluorophore considerations. Cells 2021;11(1):35.
  3. Fazel M, Grussmayer KS, Ferdman B, Radenovic A, Shechtman Y, Enderlein J, et al. Fluorescence microscopy: A statistics-optics perspective. Rev Mod Phys 2024;96(2):025003.
  4. Reiche MA, Aaron JS, Boehm U, DeSantis MC, Hobson CM, Khuon S, et al. When light meets biology–how the specimen affects quantitative microscopy. J Cell Sci 2022;135(6):jcs259656.
  5. Pushpa N, Patra A, Ravi KS. Advances in Microscopy and Its Applications with Special Reference to Fluorescence Microscope: An Overview. Biomedical Visualisation: Volume 15‒Visualisation in Teaching of Biomedical and Clinical Subjects: Anatomy, Advanced Microscopy and Radiology 2023:3-17.
  6. Stelzer EH, Strobl F, Chang B-J, Preusser F, Preibisch S, McDole K, et al. Light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2021;1(1):73.
  7. Prakash K, Diederich B, Heintzmann R, Schermelleh L. Super-resolution microscopy: a brief history and new avenues. Advances in Medical Imaging, Detection, and Diagnosis 2023:1195-1211.
  8. Fish KN. Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Curr Protoc 2022;2(8):e517.
  9. Lee D-R. Progresses in implementation of STED microscopy. Meas Sci Technol 2023;34(10):102002.
  10. López PA, Blum SA. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) as a tool to understand chemical reactions and catalysis. ACS Catal 2024;14(22):17132-17147.
  11. Fang C, Huang Y, Zhao Y. Review of FRET biosensing and its application in biomolecular detection. Am J Transl Res 2023;15(2):694.
  12. Chen K, Yan R, Xiang L, Xu K. Excitation spectral microscopy for highly multiplexed fluorescence imaging and quantitative biosensing. Light Sci Appl 2021;10(1):97.
  13. Xiao Y, Xu W. Single-molecule fluorescence imaging for probing nanocatalytic process. Chem 2023;9(1):16-28.
  14. Schirripa Spagnolo C, Luin S. Choosing the probe for single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(23):14949.
  15. Nkune NW, Moloudi K, George BP, Abrahamse H. An update on recent advances in fluorescent materials for fluorescence molecular imaging: a review. RSC adv 2025;15(28):22267-22284.
  16. Lukyanov KA. Fluorescent proteins for a brighter science. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2022;633:29-32.
  17. Yemets A, Plokhovska S, Pushkarova N, Blume Y. Quantum dot-antibody conjugates for immunofluorescence studies of biomolecules and subcellular structures. J Fluoresc 2022;32(5):1713-1723.
  18. Ovechkina VS, Zakian SM, Medvedev SP, Valetdinova KR. Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors for biomedical applications. Biomedicines 2021;9(11):1528.
  19. Wang X, Ding Q, Groleau RR, Wu L, Mao Y, Che F, et al. Fluorescent probes for disease diagnosis. Chem Rev 2024;124(11):7106-7164.
  20. Inavalli VK, Puente Muñoz V, Draffin JE, Tønnesen J. Fluorescence microscopy shadow imaging for neuroscience. Front Cell Neurosci 2024;18:1330100.
  21. Sun D, Amiri M, Meng Q, Unnithan RR, French C. Calcium signalling in neurological disorders, with insights from miniature fluorescence microscopy. Cells 2024;14(1):4.
  22. Ronzetti M, Simeonov A. A comprehensive update on the application of high-throughput fluorescence imaging for novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2025;20(6):785-797.
  23. Liu S, Shang E, Liu J, Wang Y, Bolan N, Kirkham M, et al. What have we known so far for fluorescence staining and quantification of microplastics: a tutorial review. Front Environ Sci Eng 2022;16(1):8.
  24. Sobhanan J, Anas A, Biju V. Nanomaterials for fluorescence and multimodal bioimaging. Chem Rec 2023;23(3):e202200253.
  25. Gooz M, Maldonado EN. Fluorescence microscopy imaging of mitochondrial metabolism in cancer cells. Front Oncol 2023;13:1152553.
  26. Ojha A, Ojha NK. Excitation light-induced phototoxicity during fluorescence imaging. J Biosci 2021;46(3):78.
  27. Zahumensky J, Malinsky J. Live cell fluorescence microscopy—an end-to-end workflow for high-throughput image and data analysis. Biol Methods Protoc 2024;9(1):bpae075.
  28. Liu S, Hoess P, Ries J. Super-resolution microscopy for structural cell biology. Annu Rev Biophys 2022;51(1):301-326.
  29. Trizna EY, Sinitca AM, Lyanova AI, Baidamshina DR, Zelenikhin PV, Kaplun DI, et al. Brightfield vs fluorescent staining dataset–a test bed image set for machine learning based virtual staining. Sci Data 2023;10(1):160.
  30. Peddie CJ, Genoud C, Kreshuk A, Meechan K, Micheva KD, Narayan K, et al. Volume electron microscopy. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2022;2(1):51.
  31. Tao S, He C, Hao X, Kuang C, Liu X. Principles of different x-ray phase-contrast imaging: a review. Appl Sci 2021;11(7):2971.
  32. Carreras-Puigvert J, Spjuth O. Artificial intelligence for high content imaging in drug discovery. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024;87:102842.
  33. Wang T, Chen Y, Wang B, Wu M. Recent progress of second near-infrared (NIR-II) fluorescence microscopy in bioimaging. Front Physiol 2023;14:1126805.
  34. Ohno H, Sasaki E, Yamada S, Hanaoka K. Recent advances in Si-rhodamine-based fluorescent probes for live-cell imaging. Org Biomol Chem 2024;22(16):3099-3108.
  35. Watson ER, Taherian Fard A, Mar JC. Computational methods for single-cell imaging and omics data integration. Front Mol Biosci 2022;8:768106.