Introduction to Fluorescence Microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy is an imaging technique that uses fluorescent dyes or proteins to label specific structures within a specimen. When illuminated with light of a particular wavelength, fluorophores emit light at a longer wavelength, which causes them to glow.

The principle of fluorescence, in which a substance absorbs light and then emits it, was first described in the 19th century. Fluorescence microscopy was developed in the early 20th century with ultraviolet light sources. In the 1960s, epifluorescence microscopes were invented, followed by confocal and super-resolution techniques.¹

Today, fluorescence microscopy is vital in life sciences for observing cells, tissues or molecules with high specificity and contrast. Unlike brightfield microscopy, which uses transmitted light and stains, fluorescence microscopy highlights labeled components, offering high contrast and detailed molecular information.²

Key Takeaways

Fluorescence microscopy uses fluorophores that absorb excitation light and emit lower-energy light, typically at a longer wavelength. This spectral separation, known as emission (the Stokes shift), helps produce high-contrast images of labeled structures, unlike conventional brightfield microscopy, which commonly uses transmitted light and often relies on a stain-stain approach.
Most widefield fluorescence microscopes use epifluorescence illumination, in which the objective both delivers excitation and collects reflected light and emitted fluorescence. Many designs used in most confocal systems share the same basic epi-illumination geometry. However, widefield and confocal microscopy differ in how they illuminate and detect the sample, rather than being wholly separate categories of microscopy.
Confocal, multiphoton, TIRF and super-resolution methods, such as STED, PALM, and STORM, offer different techniques, each with its own trade-offs in spatial and temporal resolution, imaging depth, acquisition speed and light exposure. Technique selection should reflect differences in penetration and phototoxicity, so the right choice depends on the biological question and the required resolution. Whether the specimen must remain viable depends on whether cells need to stay alive during imaging.
Photobleaching is an irreversible loss of fluorescence that can limit image acquisition. In fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), however, researchers deliberately bleach a defined region and measure fluorescence recovery to estimate molecular mobility and exchange. Photobleaching is a practical limitation to manage. Still, it is also deliberately exploited in FRAP to study how molecules diffuse and move, the same phenomenon that this page otherwise frames only as a problem to avoid.
Applications range from span drug discovery and high-content screening to neuroscience and pathogen detection. The appropriate method, but the right technique, depends heavily on the target, sample geometry and thickness, labeling strategy, required spatial and temporal resolution and whether live-cell cells, thick tissue or single-molecule measurements are needed.

Basic Principles of Fluorescence

Fluorescence occurs when a molecule absorbs light at a specific excitation wavelength and emits light at a longer emission wavelength, due to energy loss. The difference is called the Stokes shift, distinguishing emitted light from the excitation source. This is used in microscopy by tagging molecules with fluorophores to produce high-contrast images of cellular structures and processes.³

Every fluorophore has distinct excitation and emission spectra. Optical filters, such as excitation filters, dichroic mirrors and emission filters, match the characteristic spectra of the selected fluorophore. ²

Fluorescent imaging, while providing contrast and specificity, can be challenging due to problems, including: ⁴

Fading: gradual signal loss due to repeated illumination.
Quenching: reduced fluorescence caused by molecular interactions.
Photobleaching: irreversible fluorophore damage from light exposure.

Nonetheless, these challenges can be mitigated using antifade agents, minimizing light exposure and selecting photostable fluorophores.⁴

Components of a Fluorescence Microscope

Light Sources and Filter Sets

Fluorescence microscopy needs stable, intense light sources at specific wavelengths. For advanced methods, common options include mercury and xenon lamps, LEDs and lasers. Filter sets ensure that only the desired wavelengths are detected using excitation filters, dichroic mirrors and emission filters.⁵

In many fluorescence microscopes, the excitation filter, dichroic mirror and emission filter are combined and housed together in a single interchangeable optical block known as a filter cube. Different cubes, mounted on a turret, so users can select to match the excitation and emission spectra of specific fluorophores by rotating to a different cube.

Objectives, Detectors and Cameras

The objective lens delivers excitation light by focusing it onto the sample. It also collects signals from the fluorophores and directs them toward the eyepiece and detector to visualize and quantify intensity.⁵

Imaging Systems and Image Acquisition

Modern fluorescence microscopes integrate computer-controlled imaging systems for signal processing, time-lapse recording and three-dimensional image reconstruction, improving visualization and data analysis functionalities.⁵

Inverted Fluorescence Microscope

Typically used in live-cell imaging, inverted fluorescence microscopes place the objective lenses above the specimen, with the light source below.⁶

Types and Techniques of Fluorescence Microscopy

Looking for the right instrument rather than the underlying technique? Browse Danaher Life Sciences' full range of Laboratory Microscopes, including confocal, digital and light microscope product families.

Epifluorescence Microscopy

Epifluorescence directs excitation light through the objective lens onto the sample and collects emitted light along the same path. Many fluorescence microscopes used in the life sciences follow the design of epifluorescence microscopy.⁷

Epifluorescence is an illumination configuration rather than a separate microscope category. It directs excitation light through the objective and collects emitted fluorescence through the same objective, a design used in most widefield fluorescence microscopes and many microscopes below it. The illumination design (light source, filter cube, dichroic mirror) on which widefield systems and most confocal systems are built.

Widefield Fluorescence Microscopy

Widefield microscopy uses a parallel beam to illuminate the entire specimen at once. It is simple and cost-effective for viewing the fluorescence distribution throughout the sample, but it does not provide detailed information about 3D structures.⁷

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal microscopes use additional optics and a spatial pinhole to eliminate out-of-focus light, thereby producing sharper, high-resolution images. They produce 3D images of cells by first capturing a series of thin slices through the specimen and using optical sectioning to reconstruct the image.⁷

Multiphoton and Two-photon Microscopy

Multiphoton techniques use near-infrared lasers to excite fluorophores only at the focal point. Thus, they protect live cells from phototoxicity while penetrating deep into the sample, making them ideal for live-cell imaging.²

Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy

TIRF excites fluorophores close to the glass/water (or glass/specimen) interface, making it ideal for studying cell membranes, adhesion and molecular interactions near coverslips.⁸

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Techniques such as stimulated emission depletion (STED), photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM) overcome the diffraction limit, enabling imaging at nanometer resolution to visualize molecular structures.^7,9

Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy

Light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) illuminates a sample with a thin sheet of light, typically oriented perpendicular to the detection axis. Because fluorescence is excited primarily within the imaged plane, LSFM can reduce out-of-focus excitation, photobleaching and phototoxicity compared with conventional widefield or point-scanning confocal microscopy. It is well-suited to rapid, long-duration imaging of living embryos and organoids, as well as three-dimensional imaging of larger cleared tissue specimens.

Technique Comparison at a Glance

Technique

How it works

Best suited for

Epifluorescence

Directs excitation light through the objective onto the sample and collects emitted light along the same path.

The base illumination design on which most fluorescence microscopes in life sciences are built.

Widefield

A parallel beam illuminates the entire specimen at once.

Simple, cost-effective imaging where a detailed 3D structure isn't required.

Confocal

A spatial pinhole eliminates out-of-focus light; optical sectioning reconstructs 3D images from thin slices.

Sharper, high-resolution 3D imaging.

Multiphoton / two-photon

Near-infrared lasers excite fluorophores only at the focal point.

Deep-tissue, live-cell imaging with reduced phototoxicity.

TIRF

Excites fluorophores close to the glass/water (or glass/specimen) interface.

Studying cell membranes, adhesion and molecular interactions near coverslips.

Super-resolution (STED, PALM, STORM)

Overcomes the diffraction limit to enable nanometer-scale resolution.

Visualizing molecular structures beyond conventional resolution limits.

Light sheet

Illuminates a thin plane of the sample, typically from a direction perpendicular to the detection axis.

Rapid, long-duration imaging of living embryos and organoids and 3D imaging of larger cleared tissue specimens, with reduced out-of-focus excitation and photodamage.

Advanced Techniques

Fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM): Uses fluorescence lifetime or decay time to produce images¹⁰
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET): detects molecular interactions based on energy transfer between fluorophores separated by nanometers¹¹
Spectral imaging: Distinguishes signals from multiple fluorophores with overlapping spectra¹²
Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy: Allows direct observation of individual biomolecules, revealing dynamics, binding events and conformational changes¹³
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP): A defined region is deliberately photobleached and fluorescence recovery is measured as unbleached fluorescent molecules move into or exchange within the region. FRAP is used to assess molecular mobility, diffusion and binding dynamics.
Fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP): A defined region is repeatedly photobleached while fluorescence loss is measured elsewhere in the cell. FLIP helps reveal molecular mobility and connectivity between cellular compartments.

Fluorescent Probes and Labeling

Fluorescence microscopy relies on a variety of probes to label target molecules. These tools include fluorescent dyes (e.g., FITC, rhodamine, DAPI) and molecular probes (e.g., calcium indicators, nucleic acid stains).^14,15 Inherently fluorescent proteins, such as green fluorescent protein and its variants, enable live-cell imaging by tagging specific proteins of interest without additional labeling.¹⁶

When selecting the ideal fluorophore, researchers must consider its excitation/emission spectra, brightness, photostability and compatibility with other labels in multicolor experiments. Furthermore, they should select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap for clear signal separation.¹⁵

Immunofluorescence staining is one of the most common uses of fluorophores. This method helps target specific proteins in fixed specimens by conjugating antibodies to fluorescent dyes.¹⁷ On the other hand, genetically encoded fluorescent proteins are suitable for labeling live cells to view dynamic processes.¹⁶

Applications of Fluorescence Microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy is a cornerstone in many life sciences fields.

Biological and medical research can visualize subcellular structures and processes in detail. They can track and quantify gene expression and monitor protein localization and dynamics.¹⁸
Clinical diagnostics and pathogen detection utilize fluorescence-based assays to identify and quantify infectious agents, cancer biomarkers and genetic abnormalities.¹⁹
Neuroscience research and biomarker detection use fluorescence imaging to monitor neuronal activity, map neural circuits and detect biomarkers for neurological disorders.²⁰ They can also monitor brain activity in real time by using calcium-sensitive fluorescent probes.²¹
Drug discovery and high-content screening integrate fluorescence microscopy into lab automation and image analysis software to unlock drug discovery workflows. High-content screening of compound libraries with fluorescence microscopy reveals drug effects on cell morphology, gene expression and molecular interactions.²²
Environmental science and materials research utilize fluorescence microscopy to detect pollutants, microbes and toxins in ecosystems.²³ In addition, nanotechnology and materials science are gaining momentum to study nanoparticles and polymers for personalized medicine, regenerative biology and advanced materials engineering.²⁴

Live-Cell Imaging and Advanced Usage

Live-cell fluorescence microscopy enables the study of dynamic biological processes in real time, such as metabolism, signal transduction and cell division.²⁵ However, maintaining cell viability is crucial, especially when exposed to laser beams. Key issues in live-cell imaging include photobleaching, phototoxicity and background fluorescence.²⁶

Researchers should employ low-intensity illumination whenever possible and monitor environmental controls (temperature, humidity, CO₂). Furthermore, they should select non-toxic fluorophores or genetically encoded fluorescent proteins.²⁶

Image acquisition and analysis software can interpret live-cell imaging more comprehensively. Modern fluorescence microscopes feature time-lapse imaging, spectral separation and image reconstruction for high-quality documentation. Furthermore, they can measure fluorescence intensity, colocalization and binding kinetics of labeled molecules using image-processing software.²⁷

Advantages, Limitations and Safety Considerations

Fluorescence microscopy offers high sensitivity and specificity for visualizing subcellular structures and macromolecules that cannot be viewed under traditional light microscopy. Its combination with real-time imaging and multicolor labeling technologies is invaluable for cell biology, diagnostics and drug discovery.³

Resolution: The light diffraction of light limits conventional fluorescence microscopy; requiring super-resolution methods can surpass this limit and techniques to reveal finer spatial detail go beyond it.
Depth: In thick specimens, scattering, absorption and refractive-index variations attenuate and distort excitation and emission, making them hard to image cleanly because of poor light, reducing signal, contrast and resolution with increasing depth penetration, which blurs signals.
Signal clarity: Overlapping excitation or emission overlapping fluorophore spectra can cause bleed-through between detection channels, while sample and autofluorescence add background signal; both from biological materials can complicate detection, quantification and interpretation.

Advantages vs. Limitations at a Glance

Aspect

Key consideration

Sensitivity and specificity

Fluorescent labels enable sensitive, selective visualization of targeted molecules and structures, including multicolor and live-cell measurements.

Resolution

Conventional fluorescence microscopy is diffraction-limited; super-resolution methods can reveal finer spatial detail.

Imaging depth

In thick specimens, scattering, absorption and optical aberrations reduce signal, contrast and resolution with depth.

Signal clarity

Spectral bleed-through and sample autofluorescence can add background and complicate detection, quantification and interpretation.

Image quality over time

Photobleaching and other forms of signal loss can reduce image quality; careful illumination, photostable probes and appropriate antifade reagents can help mitigate them.

Live-sample effects

Excitation light can cause phototoxicity and alter cell behavior, making illumination intensity and exposure time important experimental considerations.

Image quality may decline due to fading (signal reduction over time), quenching (signal suppression by environmental factors) and photobleaching (permanent fluorophore damage from light exposure). Issues regarding image quality can be mitigated by minimizing illumination, using antifade reagents and choosing photostable dyes.²⁶

Finally, researchers must follow safety measures, including:²

Protection of eyes and skin from UV and laser exposure
Handling dyes and chemicals with gloves and lab safety protocols
Regularly clean optics and maintain light sources to ensure accuracy and longevity

Comparison with Other Imaging Techniques

Before deciding whether fluorescence microscopy is the most suitable technology for a research application, it is essential to understand how it differs from other microscopy techniques.

Brightfield microscopy uses transmitted white light and stains to visualize structures, but lacks specificity and contrast for molecular targets. In contrast, fluorescence microscopy uses probes to highlight specific molecules, allowing the tracking of proteins, nucleic acids and organelles.²⁹

Unlike conventional fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy can provide structural detail at nanometer resolution. However, it requires fixed samples, making it unsuitable for live-cell studies.³⁰

On the other hand, phase contrast microscopy is ideal for live cells, generating contrast in transparent specimens without dyes. However, it does not provide the molecular specificity afforded by fluorescence imaging.³¹

Fluor microscopy is preferred when researchers need to target and monitor subcellular structures, macromolecules and their dynamics with high resolution. Furthermore, nanoscale resolution can be achieved in fluorescence microscopy through advanced optical methods.

Fluorescence Microscopy vs. Other Imaging Techniques

Technique

Compared with fluorescence microscopy

Brightfield microscopy

Uses transmitted light and often stains to reveal overall morphology. It generally provides less molecular specificity and lower contrast for labeled targets than fluorescence microscopy.

Electron microscopy

Provides substantially finer structural detail, often at the nanometer scale, but conventional workflows require nonliving, extensively prepared specimens and cannot monitor dynamic processes in living cells.

Phase contrast microscopy

Generates contrast in transparent, unstained specimens and is well-suited for observing living cells. However, it does not provide the target-specific molecular information that fluorescent labels enable.

Recent Advances and Future Trends

Many innovations are underway to enhance the image quality, speed and analytical accuracy of fluorescence microscopy.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies can be combined with automation to enable high-throughput drug or target screening using fluorescence microscopy. These technologies drive faster image acquisition, advanced noise reduction and automated pattern recognition for large datasets.³² In addition, automation-driven workflows aid simultaneous detection of multiple targets across thousands of cells or tissues, accelerating drug discovery and systems biology research.²²

Simultaneously, limitations regarding brightness, stability and photobleaching are being addressed by developing far-red or near-infrared dyes and engineered fluorescent proteins.^33,34

Super-resolution and single-molecule tracking techniques enable the observation of individual protein interactions and nanoscale dynamics.¹³ These advancements make fluorescence microscopy compatible with other microscopy methods and multi-omics studies, driving seamless analysis of heterogeneous cell populations on a single-cell level.³⁵

Featured Product

DMi1 Inverted Microscope for Cell Culture

The DMi1 inverted microscope supports your specific work routine in your cell culture lab. Its operation is so intuitive, its handling so comfortable that you can fully concentrate on your work. Choose the functions you need and, if necessary, easily add a variety of accessories that are important for your work.

Learn More

See how Danaher Life Sciences can help

Talk to an expert

FAQs

What is the principle of fluorescence detection and how does fluorescence microscopy work?

Fluorescence microscopy uses fluorophores that absorb excitation light and emit lower-energy light at a longer wavelength. An excitation filter selects this light, a dichroic mirror separates excitation from emission and an emission filter passes the fluorescent signal to the detector. Fluorophores' ability to label specific targets provides high molecular specificity and contrast.

What is the difference between widefield and confocal fluorescence microscopy?

Widefield fluorescence microscopy captures fluorescence across the entire field, including out-of-focus light, enabling rapid imaging of thin samples. Confocal microscopy scans using a pinhole to reject out-of-focus light, enhancing 3D imaging of thicker specimens. The choice depends on sample thickness, speed, light exposure and detail required.

What are the main applications of fluorescence microscopy in research and diagnostics?

Fluorescence microscopy locates and quantifies proteins, nucleic acids, organelles and other labeled targets in cells and tissues. It is used in live-cell imaging, gene expression, protein localization studies, neuroscience, drug discovery, high-content screening, pathogen detection and diagnostic assays.

What are the advantages and limitations of fluorescence microscopy?

Key advantages include sensitive, target-specific detection, high image contrast, multicolor labeling and monitoring dynamic processes in living samples with compatible probes and imaging conditions. Limitations are photobleaching, phototoxicity, autofluorescence, spectral bleed-through, diffraction-limited resolution in conventional systems and reduced signal and contrast at greater depths.

What is the difference between epifluorescence and widefield fluorescence microscopy?

Epifluorescence involves illuminating and collecting emitted fluorescence through the same optical path, with widefield describing how the whole sample is simultaneously imaged. While most widefield microscopes use epifluorescence, the terms are not exact synonyms.

What is the difference between fluorescence microscopy and immunofluorescence?

Fluorescence microscopy is a broad imaging approach used to detect fluorescently labeled structures or molecules. Immunofluorescence is a method that uses antibodies to bind specific antigens and fluorescent tags to visualize targets with a fluorescence microscope. It is an application of fluorescence microscopy, not a separate imaging modality.Suggested Products in the Featured Product Section.

References

Renz M. Fluorescence microscopy—A historical and technical perspective. Cytometry Part A 2013;83(9):767-779.
Hickey SM, Ung B, Bader C, Brooks R, Lazniewska J, Johnson IR, et al. Fluorescence microscopy—an outline of hardware, biological handling, and fluorophore considerations. Cells 2021;11(1):35.
Fazel M, Grussmayer KS, Ferdman B, Radenovic A, Shechtman Y, Enderlein J, et al. Fluorescence microscopy: A statistics-optics perspective. Rev Mod Phys 2024;96(2):025003.
Reiche MA, Aaron JS, Boehm U, DeSantis MC, Hobson CM, Khuon S, et al. When light meets biology–how the specimen affects quantitative microscopy. J Cell Sci 2022;135(6):jcs259656.
Pushpa N, Patra A, Ravi KS. Advances in Microscopy and Its Applications with Special Reference to Fluorescence Microscope: An Overview. Biomedical Visualisation: Volume 15‒Visualisation in Teaching of Biomedical and Clinical Subjects: Anatomy, Advanced Microscopy and Radiology 2023:3-17.
Stelzer EH, Strobl F, Chang B-J, Preusser F, Preibisch S, McDole K, et al. Light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2021;1(1):73.
Prakash K, Diederich B, Heintzmann R, Schermelleh L. Super-resolution microscopy: a brief history and new avenues. Advances in Medical Imaging, Detection, and Diagnosis 2023:1195-1211.
Fish KN. Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Curr Protoc 2022;2(8):e517.
Lee D-R. Progresses in implementation of STED microscopy. Meas Sci Technol 2023;34(10):102002.
López PA, Blum SA. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) as a tool to understand chemical reactions and catalysis. ACS Catal 2024;14(22):17132-17147.
Fang C, Huang Y, Zhao Y. Review of FRET biosensing and its application in biomolecular detection. Am J Transl Res 2023;15(2):694.
Chen K, Yan R, Xiang L, Xu K. Excitation spectral microscopy for highly multiplexed fluorescence imaging and quantitative biosensing. Light Sci Appl 2021;10(1):97.
Xiao Y, Xu W. Single-molecule fluorescence imaging for probing nanocatalytic process. Chem 2023;9(1):16-28.
Schirripa Spagnolo C, Luin S. Choosing the probe for single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(23):14949.
Nkune NW, Moloudi K, George BP, Abrahamse H. An update on recent advances in fluorescent materials for fluorescence molecular imaging: a review. RSC adv 2025;15(28):22267-22284.
Lukyanov KA. Fluorescent proteins for a brighter science. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2022;633:29-32.
Yemets A, Plokhovska S, Pushkarova N, Blume Y. Quantum dot-antibody conjugates for immunofluorescence studies of biomolecules and subcellular structures. J Fluoresc 2022;32(5):1713-1723.
Ovechkina VS, Zakian SM, Medvedev SP, Valetdinova KR. Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors for biomedical applications. Biomedicines 2021;9(11):1528.
Wang X, Ding Q, Groleau RR, Wu L, Mao Y, Che F, et al. Fluorescent probes for disease diagnosis. Chem Rev 2024;124(11):7106-7164.
Inavalli VK, Puente Muñoz V, Draffin JE, Tønnesen J. Fluorescence microscopy shadow imaging for neuroscience. Front Cell Neurosci 2024;18:1330100.
Sun D, Amiri M, Meng Q, Unnithan RR, French C. Calcium signalling in neurological disorders, with insights from miniature fluorescence microscopy. Cells 2024;14(1):4.
Ronzetti M, Simeonov A. A comprehensive update on the application of high-throughput fluorescence imaging for novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2025;20(6):785-797.
Liu S, Shang E, Liu J, Wang Y, Bolan N, Kirkham M, et al. What have we known so far for fluorescence staining and quantification of microplastics: a tutorial review. Front Environ Sci Eng 2022;16(1):8.
Sobhanan J, Anas A, Biju V. Nanomaterials for fluorescence and multimodal bioimaging. Chem Rec 2023;23(3):e202200253.
Gooz M, Maldonado EN. Fluorescence microscopy imaging of mitochondrial metabolism in cancer cells. Front Oncol 2023;13:1152553.
Ojha A, Ojha NK. Excitation light-induced phototoxicity during fluorescence imaging. J Biosci 2021;46(3):78.
Zahumensky J, Malinsky J. Live cell fluorescence microscopy—an end-to-end workflow for high-throughput image and data analysis. Biol Methods Protoc 2024;9(1):bpae075.
Liu S, Hoess P, Ries J. Super-resolution microscopy for structural cell biology. Annu Rev Biophys 2022;51(1):301-326.
Trizna EY, Sinitca AM, Lyanova AI, Baidamshina DR, Zelenikhin PV, Kaplun DI, et al. Brightfield vs fluorescent staining dataset–a test bed image set for machine learning based virtual staining. Sci Data 2023;10(1):160.
Peddie CJ, Genoud C, Kreshuk A, Meechan K, Micheva KD, Narayan K, et al. Volume electron microscopy. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2022;2(1):51.
Tao S, He C, Hao X, Kuang C, Liu X. Principles of different x-ray phase-contrast imaging: a review. Appl Sci 2021;11(7):2971.
Carreras-Puigvert J, Spjuth O. Artificial intelligence for high content imaging in drug discovery. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024;87:102842.
Wang T, Chen Y, Wang B, Wu M. Recent progress of second near-infrared (NIR-II) fluorescence microscopy in bioimaging. Front Physiol 2023;14:1126805.
Ohno H, Sasaki E, Yamada S, Hanaoka K. Recent advances in Si-rhodamine-based fluorescent probes for live-cell imaging. Org Biomol Chem 2024;22(16):3099-3108.
Watson ER, Taherian Fard A, Mar JC. Computational methods for single-cell imaging and omics data integration. Front Mol Biosci 2022;8:768106.